McDaniel v. State
313 S.W.3d 709, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 800, 2010 WL 2378998
Opinion
ORDER
Nathaniel McDaniel appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.085 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentia-ry hearing. We find that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment under Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
McDaniel v. State, 313 S.W.3d 709, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 800, 2010 WL 2378998 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).
313 S.W.3d 709 (McDaniel v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Gamble
313 S.W.3d 709 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)