McDaniel v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

McDaniel v. State

313 S.W.3d 709, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 800, 2010 WL 2378998

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 15, 2010

DocketED 93579

StatusPublished

This text of 313 S.W.3d 709 (McDaniel v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McDaniel v. State, 313 S.W.3d 709, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 800, 2010 WL 2378998 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Nathaniel McDaniel appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.085 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentia-ry hearing. We find that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Nathaniel McDaniel appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.085 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentia-ry hearing. We find that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment under Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

313 S.W.3d 709, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 800, 2010 WL 2378998, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcdaniel-v-state-moctapp-2010.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack