State v. G. D. F.
196 P.3d 63, 223 Or. App. 490, 2008 Ore. App. LEXIS 1637
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided October 29, 2008·No. 070970063; A137035·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
In this mental commitment appeal, appellant contends that the record lacks clear and convincing evidence that, at the time of the commitment hearing, he was dangerous to himself and others because of a mental disorder. ORS 426.005(l)(d). The state concedes that the evidence is legally insufficient. On de novo review, State v. O’Neill, 274 Or 59, 61, 545 P2d 97 (1976), we agree.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. G. D. F., 196 P.3d 63, 223 Or. App. 490, 2008 Ore. App. LEXIS 1637 (Or. Ct. App. 2008).
196 P.3d 63 (State v. G. D. F.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In the Matter of Gdf
196 P.3d 63 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2008)