State v. G. D. F.
196 P.3d 63, 223 Or. App. 490, 2008 Ore. App. LEXIS 1637
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedOctober 29, 2008
Docket070970063; A137035
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 196 P.3d 63 (State v. G. D. F.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. G. D. F., 196 P.3d 63, 223 Or. App. 490, 2008 Ore. App. LEXIS 1637 (Or. Ct. App. 2008).
Opinion
In this mental commitment appeal, appellant contends that the record lacks clear and convincing evidence that, at the time of the commitment hearing, he was dangerous to himself and others because of a mental disorder. ORS 426.005(l)(d). The state concedes that the evidence is legally insufficient. On de novo review, State v. O’Neill, 274 Or 59, 61, 545 P2d 97 (1976), we agree.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
In the Matter of Gdf
196 P.3d 63 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2008)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
196 P.3d 63, 223 Or. App. 490, 2008 Ore. App. LEXIS 1637, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-g-d-f-orctapp-2008.