In the Matter of Gdf
Opinion
In the Matter of G.D.F., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person.
STATE of Oregon, Respondent,
v.
G.D.F., Appellant.
Court of Appeals of Oregon.
Lance D. Perdue, Portland, filed the brief for appellant.
Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and Judy C. Lucas, Senior Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.
Before LANDAU, Presiding Judge, and SCHUMAN, Judge, and ORTEGA, Judge.
PER CURIAM.
In this mental commitment appeal, appellant contends that the record lacks clear and convincing evidence that, at the time of the commitment hearing, he was dangerous to himself and others because of a mental disorder. ORS 426.005(1)(d). The state concedes that the evidence is legally insufficient. On de novo review, State v. O'Neill, 274 Or. 59, 61, 545 P.2d 97 (1976), we agree.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
196 P.3d 63 (In the Matter of Gdf) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.