In the Matter of Gdf
This text of 196 P.3d 63 (In the Matter of Gdf) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the Matter of G.D.F., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person.
STATE of Oregon, Respondent,
v.
G.D.F., Appellant.
Court of Appeals of Oregon.
Lance D. Perdue, Portland, filed the brief for appellant.
Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and Judy C. Lucas, Senior Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.
Before LANDAU, Presiding Judge, and SCHUMAN, Judge, and ORTEGA, Judge.
PER CURIAM.
In this mental commitment appeal, appellant contends that the record lacks clear and convincing evidence that, at the time of the commitment hearing, he was dangerous to himself and others because of a mental disorder. ORS 426.005(1)(d). The state concedes that the evidence is legally insufficient. On de novo review, State v. O'Neill, 274 Or. 59, 61, 545 P.2d 97 (1976), we agree.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
196 P.3d 63, 223 Or. App. 490, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-matter-of-gdf-orctapp-2008.