State v. Fuson
This text of 1999 Ohio 45 (State v. Fuson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 87 Ohio St.3d 252.]
THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. FUSON, APPELLEE. [Cite as State v. Fuson, 1999-Ohio-45.] Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed on authority of State v. Conyers. (No. 98-1993—Submitted November 3, 1999—Decided December 1, 1999.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Lucas County, No. L-98-1136. __________________ Julia R. Bates, Lucas County Prosecuting Attorney, and Eric A. Baum, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant. Jeffrey M. Gamso, for appellee. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of State v. Conyers (1999), 87 Ohio St.3d 246, 719 N.E.2d 535. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. __________________
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1999 Ohio 45, 87 Ohio St. 3d 252, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-fuson-ohio-1999.