State v. Fuessenich

714 A.2d 728, 50 Conn. App. 199, 1998 Conn. App. LEXIS 368
CourtConnecticut Appellate Court
DecidedSeptember 1, 1998
DocketAC 16487
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 714 A.2d 728 (State v. Fuessenich) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Appellate Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Fuessenich, 714 A.2d 728, 50 Conn. App. 199, 1998 Conn. App. LEXIS 368 (Colo. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

After a review of the record and briefs, and after hearing from the parties at oral argument, we conclude that this civil appeal by the state should be dismissed.

This appeal was consolidated with both the state’s criminal appeal from the same judgment (AC 16605) and the defendant’s appeal from the trial court’s judgment modifying and enlarging the conditions of his probation to include a drug testing provision (AC 16486). The state filed this civil appeal in the event that the trial court failed to grant the state’s request for permission to appeal.

In State v. Fuessenich, 50 Conn. App. 187, 717 A.2d 801 (1998), we addressed the question of whether a violation of probation proceeding was a criminal or civil case. We concluded that a violation of probation proceeding is a criminal case and an appeal could be taken pursuant to General Statutes § 54-96.1

The appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Fuessenich
714 A.2d 729 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
714 A.2d 728, 50 Conn. App. 199, 1998 Conn. App. LEXIS 368, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-fuessenich-connappct-1998.