Home/Court of Appeals of Oregon/State v. Friend

State v. Friend

35 P.3d 1105, 178 Or. App. 157
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedNovember 14, 2001
Docket99CR1105FE A108859
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 35 P.3d 1105 (State v. Friend) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Friend, 35 P.3d 1105, 178 Or. App. 157 (Or. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

35 P.3d 1105 (2001)
178 Or. App. 157

STATE of Oregon, Respondent,
v.
Lawrence Aaron FRIEND, Appellant.

99CR1105FE; A108859

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Argued and Submitted June 29, 2001.
Decided November 14, 2001.

Walter J. Ledesma, Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was David E. Groom, Public Defender.

Rolf C. Moan, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Michael D. Reynolds, Solicitor General.

Before EDMONDS, Presiding Judge, and ARMSTRONG and KISTLER, Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. State v. Hirsch, 177 Or.App. 441, 34 P.3d 1209 (2001).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Hirsch/Friend
114 P.3d 1104 (Oregon Supreme Court, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
35 P.3d 1105, 178 Or. App. 157, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-friend-orctapp-2001.