State v. Franklin

204 S.W.3d 228, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1218, 2006 WL 2347515
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Franklin. Read the opinion of the Court — 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 1382
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 15, 2006·No. No. ED 86229·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The defendant, Marco Franklin, appeals the judgment entered upon his convictions by a jury for first-degree assault of a law enforcement officer, Section 565.081 RSMo 2000, armed criminal action, Section 571.015 RSMo 2000, and felony resisting arrest, Section 575.150 RSMo 2000. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the [229]*229record on appeal and find no error. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties, however, have been furnished with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Franklin, 204 S.W.3d 228, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1218, 2006 WL 2347515 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

204 S.W.3d 228 (State v. Franklin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.