State v. Franklin

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Franklin

199 S.W.3d 907, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1258, 2006 WL 2472904

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Franklin. Read the opinion of the Court — 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 1382 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 29, 2006·No. No. ED 86470·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Bari Franklin, appeals from the judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of assault in the second degree and armed criminal action. On appeal, defendant argues that the trial court plainly erred when it overruled his counsel’s objection to a question asked by the prosecutor.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Bari Franklin, appeals from the judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of assault in the second degree and armed criminal action. On appeal, defendant argues that the trial court plainly erred when it overruled his counsel’s objection to a question asked by the prosecutor.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Franklin, 199 S.W.3d 907, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1258, 2006 WL 2472904 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

199 S.W.3d 907 (State v. Franklin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.