State v. Franklin
956 S.W.2d 464, 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 2128, 1997 WL 768737
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Franklin. Read the opinion of the Court — 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 329 →
Opinion
ORDER
Roy Franklin appeals his conviction for first-degree tampering with a motor vehicle. He claims that the trial court erred in denying him a mistrial after inadmissible evidence of other crimes was admitted. We disagree and hold that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the defendant’s motion for a mistrial. Finding no precedential value to our decision, we affirm by this summary order but have provided the parties with a memorandum setting out the reasons for our decision. Rule 30.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Franklin, 956 S.W.2d 464, 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 2128, 1997 WL 768737 (Mo. Ct. App. 1997).
956 S.W.2d 464 (State v. Franklin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.