State v. Franklin

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Franklin

967 S.W.2d 715, 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 888, 1998 WL 234180

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 12, 1998

DocketNo. 71628

StatusPublished

This text of 967 S.W.2d 715 (State v. Franklin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Franklin, 967 S.W.2d 715, 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 888, 1998 WL 234180 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from the judgment following his conviction by a jury for murder in the first degree in violation of section 565.020, RSMo 1994, and for armed criminal action in violation of section 571.015, RSMo 1994. Defendant was sentenced by the court as a persistent offender to two terms of life imprisonment to be served consecutively.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from the judgment following his conviction by a jury for murder in the first degree in violation of section 565.020, RSMo 1994, and for armed criminal action in violation of section 571.015, RSMo 1994. Defendant was sentenced by the court as a persistent offender to two terms of life imprisonment to be served consecutively.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

967 S.W.2d 715, 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 888, 1998 WL 234180, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-franklin-moctapp-1998.