State v. Franklin

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Franklin

331 So. 2d 492, 1976 La. LEXIS 4792

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedApril 30, 1976

DocketNo. 57829

StatusPublished

This text of 331 So. 2d 492 (State v. Franklin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Franklin, 331 So. 2d 492, 1976 La. LEXIS 4792 (La. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

In re: Willie Franklin applying for Writs of Certiorari, Prohibition and Mandamus.

Writ granted. (See Order).

The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

It is ordered that a writ of certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable Donovan W. Parker, Judge of the Nineteenth Judicial District, Court for the Parish of East Baton Rouge, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 21st day of May, 1976, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through counsel shall show cause, in this court, on the 3rd day of September, 1976, at 10 o’clock A.M., why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re: Willie Franklin applying for Writs of Certiorari, Prohibition and Mandamus.

Writ granted. (See Order).

The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

It is ordered that a writ of certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable Donovan W. Parker, Judge of the Nineteenth Judicial District, Court for the Parish of East Baton Rouge, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 21st day of May, 1976, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through counsel shall show cause, in this court, on the 3rd day of September, 1976, at 10 o’clock A.M., why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

331 So. 2d 492, 1976 La. LEXIS 4792, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-franklin-la-1976.