State v. Crockett

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Crockett

352 So. 2d 1018, 1977 La. LEXIS 5992

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided November 23, 1977·No. No. 59946·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant’s conviction and sentence are affirmed. However, the case is remanded to the Criminal District Court for an evi-dentiary hearing on the issue of whether defendant was represented by counsel, or had voluntarily waived his right to counsel, at the time he pled guilty to simple burglary in 1971, reserving to the trial court the right to modify the enhanced penalty imposed in the instant case should the facts so require. See State v. Franklin, 337 So.2d [1019]*10191152 (La.1976); State v. Brashears, 321 So.2d 330 (La.1975); State v. Strange, 308 So.2d 795 (La.1975); City of Monroe v. Coleman, 304 So.2d 332 (La.1974); State v. Guillotte, 297 So.2d 423 (La.1974).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Defendant’s conviction and sentence are affirmed. However, the case is remanded to the Criminal District Court for an evi-dentiary hearing on the issue of whether defendant was represented by counsel, or had voluntarily waived his right to counsel, at the time he pled guilty to simple burglary in 1971, reserving to the trial court the right to modify the enhanced penalty imposed in the instant case should the facts so require. See State v. Franklin, 337 So.2d [1019]*10191152 (La.1976); State v. Brashears, 321 So.2d 330 (La.1975); State v. Strange, 308 So.2d 795 (La.1975); City of Monroe v. Coleman, 304 So.2d 332 (La.1974); State v. Guillotte, 297 So.2d 423 (La.1974).

State v. Crockett, 352 So. 2d 1018, 1977 La. LEXIS 5992 (La. 1977).

Pincite

352 So. 2d 1018 (State v. Crockett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related