State v. Crockett
This text of 352 So. 2d 1018 (State v. Crockett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant’s conviction and sentence are affirmed. However, the case is remanded to the Criminal District Court for an evi-dentiary hearing on the issue of whether defendant was represented by counsel, or had voluntarily waived his right to counsel, at the time he pled guilty to simple burglary in 1971, reserving to the trial court the right to modify the enhanced penalty imposed in the instant case should the facts so require. See State v. Franklin, 337 So.2d [1019]*10191152 (La.1976); State v. Brashears, 321 So.2d 330 (La.1975); State v. Strange, 308 So.2d 795 (La.1975); City of Monroe v. Coleman, 304 So.2d 332 (La.1974); State v. Guillotte, 297 So.2d 423 (La.1974).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
352 So. 2d 1018, 1977 La. LEXIS 5992, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-crockett-la-1977.