State v. Francis

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Francis

282 S.W.3d 397, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 421, 2009 WL 909741

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 7, 2009

DocketWD 69291

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 282 S.W.3d 397 (State v. Francis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Francis, 282 S.W.3d 397, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 421, 2009 WL 909741 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM:

Steven Francis appeals his conviction after jury trial for the class D felony of driving while intoxicated. He complains on appeal about a reference to his prior convictions and about the State’s closing argument.

Having carefully considered the contentions on appeal, we find no grounds for reversing the decision. Publication of a formal opinion would not serve jurisprudential purposes or add to understanding of existing law. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order

PER CURIAM:

Steven Francis appeals his conviction after jury trial for the class D felony of driving while intoxicated. He complains on appeal about a reference to his prior convictions and about the State’s closing argument.

Having carefully considered the contentions on appeal, we find no grounds for reversing the decision. Publication of a formal opinion would not serve jurisprudential purposes or add to understanding of existing law. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

282 S.W.3d 397, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 421, 2009 WL 909741, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-francis-moctapp-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack