State v. Francis

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Francis

197 S.W.3d 247, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1170, 2006 WL 2130098

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Francis. Read the opinion of the Court — 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 421 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 1, 2006·No. No. WD 65244·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Lee S. Francis was found guilty after a jury trial of murder in the first degree and armed criminal action. He was sentenced to life without the possibility of parole for first degree murder, and to a consecutive life sentence for armed criminal action. On appeal, Francis asserts error in the admission of evidence that the victim obtained an order of protection against him and was afraid of him. Finding that Francis was not prejudiced by the admission of the evidence, the judgment is, therefore, affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Lee S. Francis was found guilty after a jury trial of murder in the first degree and armed criminal action. He was sentenced to life without the possibility of parole for first degree murder, and to a consecutive life sentence for armed criminal action. On appeal, Francis asserts error in the admission of evidence that the victim obtained an order of protection against him and was afraid of him. Finding that Francis was not prejudiced by the admission of the evidence, the judgment is, therefore, affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Francis, 197 S.W.3d 247, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1170, 2006 WL 2130098 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

197 S.W.3d 247 (State v. Francis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.