State v. Fowler
This text of 261 P.3d 1263 (State v. Fowler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
STATE of Oregon, Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
Tomi Sue FOWLER, Defendant-Appellant.
Court of Appeals of Oregon.
*1264 Bear Wilner-Nugent for appellant.
John R. Kroger, Attorney General, Jerome Lidz, Solicitor General, and Karla H. Ferrall, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
Before BREWER, Chief Judge, and EDMONDS, Senior Judge.
PER CURIAM.
This case is on remand from the Oregon Supreme Court, which determined that this court lacked jurisdiction over the supplemental judgment. State v. Fowler, 350 Or. 133, 252 P.3d 302 (2011). We previously had affirmed without opinion. State v. Fowler, 236 Or.App. 239, 236 P.3d 153 (2010). In light of the Supreme Court's remand, we modify our disposition as follows:
Appeal from supplemental judgment dismissed for lack of jurisdiction; otherwise affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
261 P.3d 1263, 244 Or. App. 570, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-fowler-orctapp-2011.