State v. Foster
This text of 2012 Ohio 5765 (State v. Foster) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[Cite as State v. Foster, 134 Ohio St.3d 590, 2012-Ohio-5765.]
THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. FOSTER, APPELLEE. [Cite as State v. Foster, 134 Ohio St.3d 590, 2012-Ohio-5765.] Court of appeals’ judgment reversed on the authority of State v. Howard. (No. 2012-0843—Submitted December 4, 2012—Decided December 7, 2012.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Montgomery County, No. 24637, 2012-Ohio-1431. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of State v. Howard, 134 Ohio St.3d 467, 2012-Ohio-5738, 983 N.E.2d 341, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for resentencing. O’CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, CUPP, and MCGEE BROWN, JJ., concur. __________________ Mathias H. Heck Jr., Montgomery County Prosecuting Attorney, and Johnna M. Shia, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant. Cicero Law Office and Anthony Cicero, for appellee. ______________________
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2012 Ohio 5765, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-foster-ohio-2012.