Home/Ohio Supreme Court/State v. Foster

State v. Foster

664 N.E.2d 925, 75 Ohio St. 3d 556
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided June 5, 1996·No. No. 95-2631·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals, since appellant has failed to demonstrate “a genuine issue as to whether * * * [he] was deprived of the effective assistance of counsel on appeal.” App.R. 26(B)(5).

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Stratton, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Foster, 664 N.E.2d 925, 75 Ohio St. 3d 556 (Ohio 1996).

664 N.E.2d 925 (State v. Foster) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Foster
1996 Ohio 461 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1996)