State v. Foster
This text of 357 S.W.3d 287 (State v. Foster) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
*288 ORDER
Chavez Foster appeals from the trial court’s judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of first-degree robbery, in violation of Section 569.020 1 , and armed criminal action, in violation of Section 571.015, for which he was sentenced to terms of ten years’ imprisonment and three years’ imprisonment and which were to be served consecutively to each other and consecutively to the sentence imposed in a prior case.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the trial court’s judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).
. All statutory citations are to RSMo 2000, unless otherwise indicated.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
357 S.W.3d 287, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 87, 2012 WL 216295, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-foster-moctapp-2012.