Roderick v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Roderick v. State

357 S.W.3d 287, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 84, 2012 WL 215854

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 24, 2012

DocketED 96595

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 357 S.W.3d 287 (Roderick v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Roderick v. State, 357 S.W.3d 287, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 84, 2012 WL 215854 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Roger Roderick (Appellant) appeals the Judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, the Honorable Margaret M. Neill presiding. Appellant pled guilty to one count of removal of a manufacturer’s number from a motor vehicle, two counts of possession of parts with altered identification numbers, and one count of defrauding secured creditors. The court accepted Appellant’s plea and sentenced him to seven years on the removal of a manufacturer’s number count and four years on each remaining count, with all sentences to run concurrently.

On appeal, Appellant argues that his plea was not voluntary because it was based on promises by his trial counsel regarding time-served credit. We have reviewed the briefs and the Record on Appeal and find no error of law in this casé. Thus, a written opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Roger Roderick (Appellant) appeals the Judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, the Honorable Margaret M. Neill presiding. Appellant pled guilty to one count of removal of a manufacturer’s number from a motor vehicle, two counts of possession of parts with altered identification numbers, and one count of defrauding secured creditors. The court accepted Appellant’s plea and sentenced him to seven years on the removal of a manufacturer’s number count and four years on each remaining count, with all sentences to run concurrently.

On appeal, Appellant argues that his plea was not voluntary because it was based on promises by his trial counsel regarding time-served credit. We have reviewed the briefs and the Record on Appeal and find no error of law in this casé. Thus, a written opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

357 S.W.3d 287, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 84, 2012 WL 215854, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roderick-v-state-moctapp-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack