Roderick v. State
361 S.W.3d 478, 2012 WL 828363, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 317
Opinion
ORDER
Roger Roderick appeals the motion court’s denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. An opinion would have no precedential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. The motion court’s conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b)(5).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Roderick v. State, 361 S.W.3d 478, 2012 WL 828363, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 317 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).
361 S.W.3d 478 (Roderick v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kwiatkowski v. ABC SUPPLY COMPANY, INC.
361 S.W.3d 478 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2012)