State v. Ford

765 So. 2d 321, 2000 La. LEXIS 1787, 2000 WL 781400
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided June 16, 2000·No. No. 99-KP-3263·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.*

Writ granted in part; otherwise denied. The district court is directed to hold an evidentiary hearing without undue delay on those of relator’s claims which it has not properly defaulted, see State ex rel. Rice v. State, 99-0496 (La.11/12/99), 749 So.2d 650, including his claims that he received ineffective assistance of trial and appellate counsel, and that the state suppressed material exculpatory evidence. In addition, the court is directed to review relator’s request for funding under R.S. 15:151.2(E)(2).

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Ford, 765 So. 2d 321, 2000 La. LEXIS 1787, 2000 WL 781400 (La. 2000).

765 So. 2d 321 (State v. Ford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Roy v. Cain
792 So. 2d 3 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 2001)