Roy v. Cain
This text of 792 So. 2d 3 (Roy v. Cain) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In re Roy, Larry; — Plaintiff; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Rapides, 9th Judicial District Court Div. A., No. 235,372.
Writ granted in part; otherwise denied; case remanded. The district court is directed to hold an evidentiary hearing on those of relator’s claims which it has not [4]*4properly defaulted: that he received ineffective assistance of trial (claims 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 10, 14, 15, 16) and appellate counsel, and that the state suppressed material exculpatory evidence (claim 5). cf. State ex rel. Tart v. Cain, 00-0476 (La.8/31/00), 766 So.2d 1268; State v. Ford, 99-3263 (La.6/16/00), 765 So.2d 321. In all other respects, the application is denied. See La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4(A); La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4(B); La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4(C); State ex rel. Rice v. State, 99-0496 (La.11/12/99), 749 So.2d 650.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
792 So. 2d 3, 2001 La. LEXIS 1261, 2001 WL 538271, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roy-v-cain-la-2001.