Roy v. Cain

792 So. 2d 3, 2001 La. LEXIS 1261, 2001 WL 538271
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided May 11, 2001·No. No. 2000-KP-2214·Published

Opinion

In re Roy, Larry; — Plaintiff; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Rapides, 9th Judicial District Court Div. A., No. 235,372.

Writ granted in part; otherwise denied; case remanded. The district court is directed to hold an evidentiary hearing on those of relator’s claims which it has not [4]*4properly defaulted: that he received ineffective assistance of trial (claims 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 10, 14, 15, 16) and appellate counsel, and that the state suppressed material exculpatory evidence (claim 5). cf. State ex rel. Tart v. Cain, 00-0476 (La.8/31/00), 766 So.2d 1268; State v. Ford, 99-3263 (La.6/16/00), 765 So.2d 321. In all other respects, the application is denied. See La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4(A); La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4(B); La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4(C); State ex rel. Rice v. State, 99-0496 (La.11/12/99), 749 So.2d 650.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Roy v. Cain, 792 So. 2d 3, 2001 La. LEXIS 1261, 2001 WL 538271 (La. 2001).

792 So. 2d 3 (Roy v. Cain) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State Ex Rel. Rice v. State
749 So. 2d 650 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1999)
State Ex Rel. Tart v. Cain
766 So. 2d 1268 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 2000)
State v. Ford
765 So. 2d 321 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 2000)