State v. Ford
636 A.2d 849, 228 Conn. 918, 1994 Conn. LEXIS 26
This text of 636 A.2d 849 (State v. Ford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Ford, 636 A.2d 849, 228 Conn. 918, 1994 Conn. LEXIS 26 (Colo. 1994).
Opinion
The state of Connecticut’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 33 Conn. App. 143 (AC 11940), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that there was insufficient evidence to convict the defendant of the crime of tampering with a witness, General Statutes §§ 53a-151 and 53a-8?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Ford
646 A.2d 147 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1994)
Ullmann v. State
647 A.2d 324 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1994)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
636 A.2d 849, 228 Conn. 918, 1994 Conn. LEXIS 26, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-ford-conn-1994.