State v. Fondren

568 P.2d 721, 30 Or. App. 1045, 1977 Ore. App. LEXIS 1772
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided September 19, 1977·No. 20990, CA 7504·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

*1047 PER CURIAM.

The state appeals from an order suppressing contraband — marihuana and peyote — seized from the defendant’s automobile. As the trial judge found, the police had probable cause to think that defendant’s automobile contained the contraband. The police, without a warrant, seized the automobile which was on the parking lot maintained by defendant’s employer for employes, and had it towed to the police garage. The police thereafter obtained a search warrant.

The trial judge held that in addition to probable cause, exigent circumstances to seize or search an operable automobile must exist before such can be done without a warrant. This was error. See State v. Greene, 30 Or App 1019, 568 P2d 716 (1977).

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Fondren, 568 P.2d 721, 30 Or. App. 1045, 1977 Ore. App. LEXIS 1772 (Or. Ct. App. 1977).

568 P.2d 721 (State v. Fondren) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Groda
591 P.2d 1354 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1979)
State v. Greene
591 P.2d 1362 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1979)
State v. Fondren
591 P.2d 1374 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1979)
State v. Downes
591 P.2d 1352 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1979)