State v. Folson

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Folson

942 S.W.2d 393, 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 274, 1997 WL 81129

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 25, 1997

DocketNo. WD 52408

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 942 S.W.2d 393 (State v. Folson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Folson, 942 S.W.2d 393, 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 274, 1997 WL 81129 (Mo. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The State appeals from an order granting defendant’s motion for new trial, arguing that the trial court was required to issue findings of fact and conclusions of law specifying the ground on which it granted the motion, and that its failure to do so constituted reversible error. Defendant argues the State had no right to appeal grant of a new trial. We consider the merits of the appeal and affirm grant of a new trial. Motion to set aside denied as moot. Finding no prece-dential value to our decision, we affirm by this summary order but have provided the parties with a memorandum setting out the reasons for our decision. Rule 30.25.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The State appeals from an order granting defendant’s motion for new trial, arguing that the trial court was required to issue findings of fact and conclusions of law specifying the ground on which it granted the motion, and that its failure to do so constituted reversible error. Defendant argues the State had no right to appeal grant of a new trial. We consider the merits of the appeal and affirm grant of a new trial. Motion to set aside denied as moot. Finding no prece-dential value to our decision, we affirm by this summary order but have provided the parties with a memorandum setting out the reasons for our decision. Rule 30.25.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

942 S.W.2d 393, 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 274, 1997 WL 81129, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-folson-moctapp-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack