State v. Flores
This text of 197 P.3d 58 (State v. Flores) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant pleaded guilty to delivery of a controlled substance to a minor, and the trial court ordered defendant to pay $1,157.73 in restitution for a sexual abuse examination of the victim. The sole issue on appeal is whether the trial court erred by imposing restitution for the examination. Defendant argues that the sexual abuse examination did not arise from criminal activity that he admitted committing or for which he was convicted, and the state concedes that the trial court erred in that regard. See State v. Seggerman, 167 Or App 140, 145, 3 P3d 168 (2000) (“[A] defendant cannot be required to pay restitution for pecuniary damages arising out of criminal activity for which he was not convicted or which he did not admit having committed.”). We agree and accept the state’s concession.
Remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
197 P.3d 58, 224 Or. App. 90, 2008 Ore. App. LEXIS 1708, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-flores-orctapp-2008.