State v. Fisk

488 A.2d 156, 1985 Me. LEXIS 635
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine·Decided February 26, 1985·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.

Defendant Robert F. Fisk, Jr., appeals from a civil judgment of the District Court (Portland) finding a violation of 29 M.R. S.A. § 1312-C(2)(B) (Supp.1984-1985) (operating under the influence). In State v. Freeman, 487 A.2d 1175 (Me.1985), we declared the civil OUI law to be unconstitutional.

The entry is:

Judgment vacated.

Remanded to the Superior Court for entry of judgment as follows:

“Judgment of the District Court vacated; remanded to the District Court with directions to enter an order dismissing the civil proceeding under 29 M.R.S.A. § 1312-C.”

All concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Fisk, 488 A.2d 156, 1985 Me. LEXIS 635 (Me. 1985).

488 A.2d 156 (State v. Fisk) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Mitchell
511 A.2d 1068 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1986)