State v. Fisk
This text of 488 A.2d 156 (State v. Fisk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.
Defendant Robert F. Fisk, Jr., appeals from a civil judgment of the District Court (Portland) finding a violation of 29 M.R. S.A. § 1312-C(2)(B) (Supp.1984-1985) (operating under the influence). In State v. Freeman, 487 A.2d 1175 (Me.1985), we declared the civil OUI law to be unconstitutional.
The entry is:
Judgment vacated.
Remanded to the Superior Court for entry of judgment as follows:
“Judgment of the District Court vacated; remanded to the District Court with directions to enter an order dismissing the civil proceeding under 29 M.R.S.A. § 1312-C.”
All concurring.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
488 A.2d 156, 1985 Me. LEXIS 635, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-fisk-me-1985.