State v. Feist
This text of 2015 ND 164 (State v. Feist) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Filed 7/1/15 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2015 ND 164
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Douglas Gary Feist, Defendant and Appellant
No. 20150041
Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, The Honorable Thomas J. Schneider, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Britta Demello Rice, 514 East Thayer Avenue, Bismarck, ND 58501, for plaintiff and appellee.
Michael R. Hoffman, P.O. Box 1056, Bismarck, ND 58502-1056, for defendant and appellant.
State v. Feist
[¶1] Douglas Gary Feist appeals from a criminal judgment entered upon a jury conviction of criminal mischief and from a district court order granting the State’s motion in limine to limit evidence of restitution. Feist argues the district court erred by granting the State’s motion in limine. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4), concluding the district court did not abuse its discretion.
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Daniel J. Crothers
Lisa Fair McEvers
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Dale V. Sandstrom
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2015 ND 164, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-feist-nd-2015.