State v. Fautenberry
This text of 677 N.E.2d 1194 (State v. Fautenberry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We affirm the judgments of the court of appeals denying appellant’s application for reopening and motion for reconsideration for the same reasons articulated by the court of appeals. Further, appellant has failed to establish the existence of a colorable claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel under Strickland v. Washington (1984), 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674. We reject all of appellant's propositions of law raised before this court.
Judgments affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
677 N.E.2d 1194, 78 Ohio St. 3d 320, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-fautenberry-ohio-1997.