State v. Faraday

806 A.2d 1055, 261 Conn. 915, 2002 Conn. LEXIS 357
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedSeptember 5, 2002
DocketSC 16827
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 806 A.2d 1055 (State v. Faraday) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Faraday, 806 A.2d 1055, 261 Conn. 915, 2002 Conn. LEXIS 357 (Colo. 2002).

Opinion

The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 69 Conn. App. 421 (AC 20667), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that General Statutes § 53a-32 was not applicable because it could not be applied retroactively to the defendant?

“2. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court improperly determined that the conditions of probation had been violated?”

[916]*916The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16827. Michele C. Lukban, assistant state’s attorney, in support of the petition. Tracey M. Lane, special public defender, in opposition. Decided September 5, 2002

VERTEFEUILLE, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Faraday
842 A.2d 567 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
806 A.2d 1055, 261 Conn. 915, 2002 Conn. LEXIS 357, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-faraday-conn-2002.