State v. Essex

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Essex

342 S.W.3d 928, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 927, 2011 WL 2611135

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJuly 5, 2011

DocketED 94042

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 342 S.W.3d 928 (State v. Essex) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Essex, 342 S.W.3d 928, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 927, 2011 WL 2611135 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Deondre Essex appeals his conviction for first-degree child molestation, section 566.067, RSMo Cum.Supp.2011, and sentence of ten years imprisonment. He contends that the trial court abused its discretion in admitting the victim’s out-of-court statements, excluding evidence of a prior unsubstantiated allegation by the victim, and excluding evidence of his time sheets from his place of employment. Because a published opinion would have no prece-dential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment of conviction is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Deondre Essex appeals his conviction for first-degree child molestation, section 566.067, RSMo Cum.Supp.2011, and sentence of ten years imprisonment. He contends that the trial court abused its discretion in admitting the victim’s out-of-court statements, excluding evidence of a prior unsubstantiated allegation by the victim, and excluding evidence of his time sheets from his place of employment. Because a published opinion would have no prece-dential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment of conviction is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

342 S.W.3d 928, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 927, 2011 WL 2611135, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-essex-moctapp-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack