State v. Essex

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Essex

342 S.W.3d 928, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 927, 2011 WL 2611135

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided July 5, 2011·No. ED 94042·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Deondre Essex appeals his conviction for first-degree child molestation, section 566.067, RSMo Cum.Supp.2011, and sentence of ten years imprisonment. He contends that the trial court abused its discretion in admitting the victim’s out-of-court statements, excluding evidence of a prior unsubstantiated allegation by the victim, and excluding evidence of his time sheets from his place of employment. Because a published opinion would have no prece-dential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment of conviction is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Deondre Essex appeals his conviction for first-degree child molestation, section 566.067, RSMo Cum.Supp.2011, and sentence of ten years imprisonment. He contends that the trial court abused its discretion in admitting the victim’s out-of-court statements, excluding evidence of a prior unsubstantiated allegation by the victim, and excluding evidence of his time sheets from his place of employment. Because a published opinion would have no prece-dential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment of conviction is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Essex, 342 S.W.3d 928, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 927, 2011 WL 2611135 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

342 S.W.3d 928 (State v. Essex) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related