Pohlmann v. Neel
342 S.W.3d 928, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 928, 2011 WL 2620417
Opinion
ORDER
The plaintiffs appeal from the trial court’s denial of their motion for class-action certification. An opinion would have no precedential value. We have fur *929 nished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b)(5).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pohlmann v. Neel, 342 S.W.3d 928, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 928, 2011 WL 2620417 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).
342 S.W.3d 928 (Pohlmann v. Neel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Essex
342 S.W.3d 928 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)