State v. Enslin

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

State v. Enslin

214 S.E.2d 318, 25 N.C. App. 662, 1975 N.C. App. LEXIS 2359

CourtCourt of Appeals of North Carolina

DecidedMay 7, 1975

Docket754SC90

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 214 S.E.2d 318 (State v. Enslin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Enslin, 214 S.E.2d 318, 25 N.C. App. 662, 1975 N.C. App. LEXIS 2359 (N.C. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

BRITT, Judge.

By his sole assignment of error, defendant contends the court erred in denying his motions to quash the indictment, dismiss the action, and for nonsuit on the ground that the statute under which he was indicted, G.S. 14-177, is unconstitutional, in that it violates the First, Third, Fourth, Fifth, Ninth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Federal Constitution. We find no merit in the assignment.

In State v. Crouse, 22 N.C. App. 47, 205 S.E. 2d 361 (1974), and State v. Moles, 17 N.C. App. 664, 195 S.E. 2d 352 (1973), this court upheld the constitutionality of G.S. 14-177. We reaffirm- our rulings in these cases and again hold that the subject statute is constitutional.

No error.

Judges Hedrick and Martin concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI