State v. Enslin

214 S.E.2d 318, 25 N.C. App. 662, 1975 N.C. App. LEXIS 2359
Court of Appeals of North Carolina·Decided May 7, 1975·No. 754SC90·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

BRITT, Judge.

By his sole assignment of error, defendant contends the court erred in denying his motions to quash the indictment, dismiss the action, and for nonsuit on the ground that the statute under which he was indicted, G.S. 14-177, is unconstitutional, in that it violates the First, Third, Fourth, Fifth, Ninth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Federal Constitution. We find no merit in the assignment.

In State v. Crouse, 22 N.C. App. 47, 205 S.E. 2d 361 (1974), and State v. Moles, 17 N.C. App. 664, 195 S.E. 2d 352 (1973), this court upheld the constitutionality of G.S. 14-177. We reaffirm- our rulings in these cases and again hold that the subject statute is constitutional.

No error.

Judges Hedrick and Martin concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Enslin, 214 S.E.2d 318, 25 N.C. App. 662, 1975 N.C. App. LEXIS 2359 (N.C. Ct. App. 1975).

214 S.E.2d 318 (State v. Enslin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Creech v. Sparkman
523 F. Supp. 1157 (E.D. North Carolina, 1981)
State v. Adams
264 S.E.2d 46 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1980)
State v. Poe
252 S.E.2d 843 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1979)
State v. Enslin
217 S.E.2d 669 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1975)