State v. Enslin
217 S.E.2d 669, 288 N.C. 245, 1975 N.C. LEXIS 936
This text of 217 S.E.2d 669 (State v. Enslin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Enslin, 217 S.E.2d 669, 288 N.C. 245, 1975 N.C. LEXIS 936 (N.C. 1975).
Opinion
STATE of North Carolina
v.
Eugene ENSLIN.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Smith, Carrington, Patterson, Follin & Curtis, for defendant.
Rufus L. Edmisten, Atty. Gen., Edwin M. Speas, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
Petition by defendant for writ of certiorari to review the decision of the Court of Appeals, 25 N.C.App. 662, 214 S.E.2d 318. Denied. Appeal dismissed ex mero motu for lack of substantial constitutional question.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Enslin
214 S.E.2d 318 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1975)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
217 S.E.2d 669, 288 N.C. 245, 1975 N.C. LEXIS 936, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-enslin-nc-1975.