State v. Ellis

District Court of Appeal of Florida

State v. Ellis

715 So. 2d 364, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 10362, 1998 WL 472823

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 14, 1998

DocketNo. 97-2552

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 715 So. 2d 364 (State v. Ellis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Ellis, 715 So. 2d 364, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 10362, 1998 WL 472823 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

Ellis pled to two counts of possession of cocaine. In return, the State entered a nolle prosequi to various other drug charges. At sentencing the trial judge, over the State’s objection, imposed downward departure sentences. No reasons were orally pronounced for the departure; however, attached to the scoresheet is a page listing numerous reasons for departure. A box was checked next to “Defendant requires specialized treatment for addiction, mental disorder, or physical disability, and the defendant is amenable to treatment.”

As the State points out, even if this procedure is deemed compliant with the rule,¹ the record is devoid of any evidence supporting such finding. See State v. Hill, 698 So.2d 647, 648 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997); see also State v. Kennedy, 698 So.2d 349, 351 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). Accordingly, we reverse and remand. Upon remand, a guideline sentence must be imposed, or alternatively, Ellis may withdraw his plea. State v. McGriff, 698 So.2d 331 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

W. SHARP and GOSHORN, JJ., concur. HARRIS, J., concurs and concurs specially, with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Ellis pled to two counts of possession of cocaine. In return, the State entered a nolle prosequi to various other drug charges. At sentencing the trial judge, over the State’s objection, imposed downward departure sentences. No reasons were orally pronounced for the departure; however, attached to the scoresheet is a page listing numerous reasons for departure. A box was checked next to “Defendant requires specialized treatment for addiction, mental disorder, or physical disability, and the defendant is amenable to treatment.”

As the State points out, even if this procedure is deemed compliant with the rule,¹ the record is devoid of any evidence supporting such finding. See State v. Hill, 698 So.2d 647, 648 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997); see also State v. Kennedy, 698 So.2d 349, 351 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). Accordingly, we reverse and remand. Upon remand, a guideline sentence must be imposed, or alternatively, Ellis may withdraw his plea. State v. McGriff, 698 So.2d 331 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

W. SHARP and GOSHORN, JJ., concur. HARRIS, J., concurs and concurs specially, with opinion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

715 So. 2d 364, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 10362, 1998 WL 472823, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-ellis-fladistctapp-1998.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack