State v. ELECK
This text of 30 A.3d 2 (State v. ELECK) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
STATE of Connecticut
v.
Robert ELECK.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
William B. Westcott, in support of the petition.
Timothy F. Costello, assistant state's attorney, in opposition.
The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 130 Conn.App. 632, 23 A.3d 818, is granted, limited to the following issue:
"Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in concluding that Facebook messages purportedly sent by a witness were inadmissible because they lacked sufficient authentication?"
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
30 A.3d 2, 302 Conn. 945, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-eleck-conn-2011.