State v. Edwards

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Edwards

456 S.W.3d 105, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 269, 2015 WL 1090167

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Edwards. Read the opinion of the Court — 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 312 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 10, 2015·No. WD 77233·Published

Opinion

[106]*106 ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Richard Edwards Jr. appeals his conviction and twelve-year sentence for class A felony financial exploitation of the elderly, section 570.145, RSMo Cum. Supp. 2013. He raises three points on appeal regarding ineffective assistance of counsel and closing argument. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment of conviction is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[106]*106 ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Richard Edwards Jr. appeals his conviction and twelve-year sentence for class A felony financial exploitation of the elderly, section 570.145, RSMo Cum. Supp. 2013. He raises three points on appeal regarding ineffective assistance of counsel and closing argument. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment of conviction is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Edwards, 456 S.W.3d 105, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 269, 2015 WL 1090167 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

456 S.W.3d 105 (State v. Edwards) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.