State v. Edenburn

243 P.3d 138, 238 Or. App. 750, 2010 Ore. App. LEXIS 1426
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided November 17, 2010·No. 08C49021; A143155·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant, who was convicted of a number of crimes, seeks reversal of his convictions on two counts of aggravated first-degree theft, ORS 164.057, asserting that the state failed to present evidence sufficient to support convictions on those counts. The state concedes that the evidence was insufficient and that defendant’s convictions for aggravated first-degree theft should be reversed. We agree, accept the concession, reverse those convictions, and, pursuant to ORS 138.222(5)(b), remand the case for resentencing.

Convictions for aggravated first-degree theft reversed; remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Edenburn, 243 P.3d 138, 238 Or. App. 750, 2010 Ore. App. LEXIS 1426 (Or. Ct. App. 2010).

243 P.3d 138 (State v. Edenburn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. EDENBURN
243 P.3d 138 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2010)