State v. EDENBURN
This text of 243 P.3d 138 (State v. EDENBURN) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
STATE of Oregon, Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
Frank Darrel EDENBURN, Sr., Defendant-Appellant.
Court of Appeals of Oregon.
Peter Gartlan, Chief Defender, and Ingrid A. MacFarlane, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant.
John R. Kroger, Attorney General, Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and Cecil A. Reniche-Smith, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.
Before SCHUMAN, Presiding Judge, and WOLLHEIM, Judge, and ROSENBLUM, Judge.
PER CURIAM.
Defendant, who was convicted of a number of crimes, seeks reversal of his convictions on two counts of aggravated first-degree theft, ORS 164.057, asserting that the state failed to present evidence sufficient to support convictions on those counts. The state concedes that the evidence was insufficient and that defendant's convictions for aggravated first-degree theft should be reversed. We agree, accept the concession, reverse those convictions, and, pursuant to ORS 138.222(5)(b), remand the case for resentencing.
Convictions for aggravated first-degree theft reversed; remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
243 P.3d 138, 238 Or. App. 750, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-edenburn-orctapp-2010.