State v. Edelman

Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. Edelman

815 A.2d 104, 262 Conn. 392, 2003 Conn. LEXIS 52

CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut

DecidedFebruary 18, 2003

DocketSC 16623

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 815 A.2d 104 (State v. Edelman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Edelman, 815 A.2d 104, 262 Conn. 392, 2003 Conn. LEXIS 52 (Colo. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant, Steven Edelman, appeals, following our grant of certification to appeal, from the judgment of the Appellate Court reversing the trial court’s judgment of conviction of violating the state building code, as prohibited by General Statutes (Rev. to 1997) § 29-263,¹ and remanding the case for a new trial. State v. Edelman, 64 Conn. App. 480, 780 A.2d 980 [393]*393(2001). We granted the defendant’s petition for certification to appeal limited to the following issue: “Under the plain error doctrine, should the defendant’s conviction be reversed and judgment directed in his favor, on the ground that there was no evidence that the defendant unlawfully continued to work under § 118.2 of the state building code?” State v. Edelman, 258 Conn. 940, 786 A.2d 427 (2001).

After examining the entire record on appeal and considering the briefs and oral arguments of the parties, we have determined that the appeal in this case should be dismissed on the ground that certification was improvidently granted.

The appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant, Steven Edelman, appeals, following our grant of certification to appeal, from the judgment of the Appellate Court reversing the trial court’s judgment of conviction of violating the state building code, as prohibited by General Statutes (Rev. to 1997) § 29-263,¹ and remanding the case for a new trial. State v. Edelman, 64 Conn. App. 480, 780 A.2d 980 [393]*393(2001). We granted the defendant’s petition for certification to appeal limited to the following issue: “Under the plain error doctrine, should the defendant’s conviction be reversed and judgment directed in his favor, on the ground that there was no evidence that the defendant unlawfully continued to work under § 118.2 of the state building code?” State v. Edelman, 258 Conn. 940, 786 A.2d 427 (2001).

After examining the entire record on appeal and considering the briefs and oral arguments of the parties, we have determined that the appeal in this case should be dismissed on the ground that certification was improvidently granted.

The appeal is dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

815 A.2d 104, 262 Conn. 392, 2003 Conn. LEXIS 52, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-edelman-conn-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack