State v. Edelman

Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. Edelman

786 A.2d 427, 258 Conn. 940, 2001 Conn. LEXIS 497

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided November 14, 2001·No. SC 16623·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 64 Conn. App. 480 (AC 20145), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Under the plain error doctrine, should the defendant’s conviction be reversed and judgment be directed in his favor, on the ground that there was no evidence that the defendant unlawfully continued to work under § 118.2 of the state building code?”

NORCOTT, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 64 Conn. App. 480 (AC 20145), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Under the plain error doctrine, should the defendant’s conviction be reversed and judgment be directed in his favor, on the ground that there was no evidence that the defendant unlawfully continued to work under § 118.2 of the state building code?”

NORCOTT, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

State v. Edelman, 786 A.2d 427, 258 Conn. 940, 2001 Conn. LEXIS 497 (Colo. 2001).

Pincite

786 A.2d 427 (State v. Edelman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related