Home/Court of Appeals of Oregon/State v. E. M. Z.

State v. E. M. Z.

206 P.3d 1212, 228 Or. App. 225, 2009 Ore. App. LEXIS 323
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedApril 29, 2009
DocketM0807026; A139523
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 206 P.3d 1212 (State v. E. M. Z.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. E. M. Z., 206 P.3d 1212, 228 Or. App. 225, 2009 Ore. App. LEXIS 323 (Or. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

In this mental commitment case, appellant contends that the record does not contain clear and convincing evidence that her mental disorder caused her to be a danger to herself or to others or unable to provide for her basic needs. The state concedes the point. On de novo review, we agree that the evidence is legally insufficient.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Emz
206 P.3d 1212 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
206 P.3d 1212, 228 Or. App. 225, 2009 Ore. App. LEXIS 323, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-e-m-z-orctapp-2009.