State v. E. M. Z.
206 P.3d 1212, 228 Or. App. 225, 2009 Ore. App. LEXIS 323
Opinion
In this mental commitment case, appellant contends that the record does not contain clear and convincing evidence that her mental disorder caused her to be a danger to herself or to others or unable to provide for her basic needs. The state concedes the point. On de novo review, we agree that the evidence is legally insufficient.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. E. M. Z., 206 P.3d 1212, 228 Or. App. 225, 2009 Ore. App. LEXIS 323 (Or. Ct. App. 2009).
206 P.3d 1212 (State v. E. M. Z.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Matter of Emz
206 P.3d 1212 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2009)