Matter of Emz
This text of 206 P.3d 1212 (Matter of Emz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the Matter of E.M.Z., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person.
STATE of Oregon, Respondent,
v.
E.M.Z., Appellant.
Court of Appeals of Oregon.
Gay Canaday filed the brief for appellant.
John R. Kroger, Attorney General, Erika L. Hadlock, Acting Solicitor General, and Amanda J. Austin, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.
Before LANDAU, Presiding Judge, and SCHUMAN, Judge, and ORTEGA, Judge.
PER CURIAM.
In this mental commitment case, appellant contends that the record does not contain clear and convincing evidence that her mental disorder caused her to be a danger to herself or to others or unable to provide for her basic needs. The state concedes the *1213 point. On de novo review, we agree that the evidence is legally insufficient.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
206 P.3d 1212, 228 Or. App. 225, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-emz-orctapp-2009.