Matter of Emz
Opinion
In the Matter of E.M.Z., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person.
STATE of Oregon, Respondent,
v.
E.M.Z., Appellant.
Court of Appeals of Oregon.
Gay Canaday filed the brief for appellant.
John R. Kroger, Attorney General, Erika L. Hadlock, Acting Solicitor General, and Amanda J. Austin, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.
Before LANDAU, Presiding Judge, and SCHUMAN, Judge, and ORTEGA, Judge.
PER CURIAM.
In this mental commitment case, appellant contends that the record does not contain clear and convincing evidence that her mental disorder caused her to be a danger to herself or to others or unable to provide for her basic needs. The state concedes the *1213 point. On de novo review, we agree that the evidence is legally insufficient.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
206 P.3d 1212 (Matter of Emz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.