State v. Durr

643 N.E.2d 1147, 71 Ohio St. 3d 395
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 30, 1994·No. No. 94-1820·Published·Cited by 12 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decision of the court of appeals is affirmed for the reasons stated in its opinion.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. Wright, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Durr, 643 N.E.2d 1147, 71 Ohio St. 3d 395 (Ohio 1994).

643 N.E.2d 1147 (State v. Durr) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Durr v. Mitchell
Sixth Circuit, 2007
Darryl M. Durr v. Betty Mitchell, Warden
487 F.3d 423 (Sixth Circuit, 2007)
State v. Sizemore
709 N.E.2d 943 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1998)
State v. Durr
1994 Ohio 58 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1994)