Home/Missouri Court of Appeals/State v. Durnil

State v. Durnil

301 S.W.3d 593, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 90, 2010 WL 345323
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedFebruary 2, 2010
DocketWD 70220
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 301 S.W.3d 593 (State v. Durnil) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Durnil, 301 S.W.3d 593, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 90, 2010 WL 345323 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Christopher B. Durnil appeals his conviction for assault in the first degree, § 565.050, RSMo 2000, burglary in the first degree, § 569.160, and armed criminal action, § 571.015. Durnil argues that the trial court plainly erred in failing, sua sponte, to declare a mistrial after a venire-person stated during voir dire that she had previously seen Durnil “throw fits” in public. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rhodes v. State
301 S.W.3d 593 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
301 S.W.3d 593, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 90, 2010 WL 345323, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-durnil-moctapp-2010.