Rhodes v. State
301 S.W.3d 593, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 84, 2010 WL 345478
Opinion
ORDER
Ronnie Rhodes appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing. On appeal, Rhodes claims that the motion court clearly erred in denying his motion because he received ineffective assistance of counsel when his trial attorney failed to request a jury instruction on a lesser-included offense. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.
The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rhodes v. State, 301 S.W.3d 593, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 84, 2010 WL 345478 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).
301 S.W.3d 593 (Rhodes v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Durnil
301 S.W.3d 593 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)