Rhodes v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Rhodes v. State

301 S.W.3d 593, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 84, 2010 WL 345478

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 2, 2010

DocketWD 70256

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 301 S.W.3d 593 (Rhodes v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rhodes v. State, 301 S.W.3d 593, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 84, 2010 WL 345478 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Ronnie Rhodes appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing. On appeal, Rhodes claims that the motion court clearly erred in denying his motion because he received ineffective assistance of counsel when his trial attorney failed to request a jury instruction on a lesser-included offense. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Ronnie Rhodes appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing. On appeal, Rhodes claims that the motion court clearly erred in denying his motion because he received ineffective assistance of counsel when his trial attorney failed to request a jury instruction on a lesser-included offense. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

301 S.W.3d 593, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 84, 2010 WL 345478, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rhodes-v-state-moctapp-2010.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack