State v. Durham

634 So. 2d 838, 1994 La. LEXIS 598, 1994 WL 79650
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Durham. Read the opinion of the Court — 1994 La. LEXIS 693
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided March 11, 1994·No. No. 94-KD-0535·Published

Opinion

In re Durham, Joel; — Defendant(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 94-KW-0102; Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court, Div. “H”, No. 92-0960.

Stay order recalled. The case may proceed to trial if the district attorney stipulates that he will forego use of La.Code Crim.Proe. art. 906.2 B. In the alternative, if the district attorney prefers not to forego use of La.Code Crim.Proe. art. 905.2 B, he shall notify this Court of his decision by March 16, 1994, in which ease the trial shall be stayed and the application will be granted and assigned for oral argument. ■

DENNIS, J., not on panel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Durham, 634 So. 2d 838, 1994 La. LEXIS 598, 1994 WL 79650 (La. 1994).

634 So. 2d 838 (State v. Durham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.