State v. Durham

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Durham

593 So. 2d 377, 1992 La. LEXIS 772, 1992 WL 38760

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Durham. Read the opinion of the Court — 1994 La. LEXIS 693 →

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided February 28, 1992·No. No. 92-KK-0483·Published

Opinion

In re Durham, Joel; — Defendants); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 92-KW-0142; Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court, Div. “L”, No. B 7271-92.

Granted. Relator is entitled to have his counsel present throughout any lineup proceedings, including the post-viewing witness interview. So ordered.

MARCUS, LEMMON and COLE, JJ., dissent from the order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Durham, Joel; — Defendants); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 92-KW-0142; Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court, Div. “L”, No. B 7271-92.

Granted. Relator is entitled to have his counsel present throughout any lineup proceedings, including the post-viewing witness interview. So ordered.

MARCUS, LEMMON and COLE, JJ., dissent from the order.

State v. Durham, 593 So. 2d 377, 1992 La. LEXIS 772, 1992 WL 38760 (La. 1992).

Pincite

593 So. 2d 377 (State v. Durham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.