State v. Duncan
669 S.E.2d 738, 362 N.C. 665, 2008 N.C. LEXIS 995
Opinion
For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion of the Court of Appeals, the decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed and that court is instructed to reinstate the judgment of the trial court. Discretionary review of the additional issue was improvidently allowed. Defendant’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is dismissed without prejudice to his right to raise that issue by filing a motion for appropriate relief in the superior court.
REVERSED; DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Duncan, 669 S.E.2d 738, 362 N.C. 665, 2008 N.C. LEXIS 995 (N.C. 2008).
669 S.E.2d 738 (State v. Duncan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Copenhaver
Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2025
State v. Potter
680 S.E.2d 262 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2009)
State v. Streater
678 S.E.2d 367 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2009)
State v. Keaton
676 S.E.2d 670 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2009)
Crawford v. Mintz
669 S.E.2d 738 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2008)