Crawford v. Mintz
669 S.E.2d 738, 362 N.C. 666, 2008 N.C. LEXIS 998
Opinion
For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, the decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed. This case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for consideration of the remaining assignments of error. Plaintiffs’ petition for discretionary review as to additional issues was improvidently allowed.
REVERSED AND REMANDED; DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Crawford v. Mintz, 669 S.E.2d 738, 362 N.C. 666, 2008 N.C. LEXIS 998 (N.C. 2008).
669 S.E.2d 738 (Crawford v. Mintz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Crawford v. Mintz
673 S.E.2d 746 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2009)
State v. Duncan
669 S.E.2d 738 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2008)