State v. . Dry

Supreme Court of North Carolina

State v. . Dry

29 S.E.2d 698, 224 N.C. 234, 1944 N.C. LEXIS 341

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedApril 12, 1944

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 29 S.E.2d 698 (State v. . Dry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. . Dry, 29 S.E.2d 698, 224 N.C. 234, 1944 N.C. LEXIS 341 (N.C. 1944).

Pincite

Opinion

Defendant entered a plea of guilty on 8 February, 1943, to charges contained in four separate warrants, in the recorder's court of Cabarrus County. Prison sentence was entered in each case and suspended upon certain conditions. The recorder of said court, on 6 December, 1943, found as a fact that the defendant had willfully violated the terms and conditions of the suspended sentence in one of the above cases, and ordered capias to issue. Defendant appealed to the Superior Court and the judgment of the recorder's court was affirmed. Whereupon, the defendant appealed to the Supreme Court and assigns error. The record proper filed in this Court is fatally defective for the reason that no warrant appears therein.

The appeal is dismissed on the authority of S. v. Currie, 206 N.C. 598,174 S.E. 447, and Pruitt v. Wood, 199 N.C. 788, 156 S.E. 126.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Defendant entered a plea of guilty on 8 February, 1943, to charges contained in four separate warrants, in the recorder's court of Cabarrus County. Prison sentence was entered in each case and suspended upon certain conditions. The recorder of said court, on 6 December, 1943, found as a fact that the defendant had willfully violated the terms and conditions of the suspended sentence in one of the above cases, and ordered capias to issue. Defendant appealed to the Superior Court and the judgment of the recorder's court was affirmed. Whereupon, the defendant appealed to the Supreme Court and assigns error. The record proper filed in this Court is fatally defective for the reason that no warrant appears therein.

The appeal is dismissed on the authority of S. v. Currie, 206 N.C. 598,174 S.E. 447, and Pruitt v. Wood, 199 N.C. 788, 156 S.E. 126.

Appeal dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

29 S.E.2d 698, 224 N.C. 234, 1944 N.C. LEXIS 341, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-dry-nc-1944.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack